RUIN
MAGNUS MAXIMUS, a Spaniard, was a military commander in Britain when, in 383, he was proclaimed emperor by the troops, and promptly sailed for Gaul. At the time, the western empire was ruled by Gratian and the twelve year old Valentinian II; the eastern by Theodosius. Gratian confronted Maximus, in the vicinity of Paris, but his army deserted to Maximus and he was forced to flee. Maximus sent his cavalry commander, Andragathius, in pursuit of Gratian. Gratian was caught and killed near Lyons.
"... [Gratian] aroused the hatred of the troops against himself when he neglected the army and preferred to the venerable Roman soldier a few from the Alans whom he had arrogated to himself by an immense payment of gold, and with the retinue of barbarians he had almost even begun to have friendship ..."
Anonymous 'Epitome de Caesaribus' (c.395)
"Peeved because Theodosius was considered worthy of the throne while he himself had not been promoted even to an honorific office, Maximus further roused the soldiers to hatred against the Emperor. They for their part were quick to rebel and proclaim Maximus Emperor."
Zosimus * 'Historia Nova' (probably early 6th Century)
"Andragathius obtained possession of the imperial chariot, and sent word to the emperor that his consort was traveling towards his camp. Gratian, who was but recently married and youthful, as well as passionately attached to his wife, hastened incautiously across the river, and in his anxiety to meet her fell without forethought into the hands of Andragathius; he was seized, and, in a little while, put to death. He was in the twenty-fourth year of his age, and had reigned fifteen years."
'The Ecclesiastical History of Salaminius Hermias Sozomenus' (d.c.450)
"... Maximus maintained that he had not of his own accord assumed the sovereignty, but that he had simply defended by arms the necessary requirements of the empire, regard to which had been imposed upon him by the soldiers, according to the Divine appointment, and that the favour of God did not seem wanting to him who, by an event seemingly so incredible, had secured the victory, adding to that the statement that none of his adversaries had been slain except in the open field of battle ..."
Sulpitius Severus (d.c.420) 'Life of St.Martin'
An uneasy peace was reached between Maximus, Theodosius and Valentinian, in which Maximus was effectively accepted as Gratian's successor, ruling Gaul, Britain and Spain. In 387, however, Maximus invaded Italy, forcing Valentinian to flee to Theodosius.
"The pretext which he [Maximus] advanced for this measure was, that he desired to prevent the introduction of innovations in the ancient form of religion and of ecclesiastical order; but he was in reality actuated by the desire of dispelling any suspicion that might have been excited as to his aspirations after tyranny. He was watching and intriguing for the imperial rule in such a way that it might appear as if he had acquired the Roman government by law, and not by force."
'The Ecclesiastical History of Salaminius Hermias Sozomenus'
Theodosius marched west to meet Maximus. Finally, in 388, Theodosius captured and executed Maximus at Aquileia.
"As the emperor marched against the usurper the intelligence of the formidable preparations made by him so alarmed the troops under Maximus, that instead of fighting for him, they delivered him bound to the emperor, who caused him to be put to death ..."
Socrates Scholasticus (fl.5th century) 'Ecclesiastical History'
"... at Aquileia he [Theodosius] killed Maximus the tyrant ... and executed his son Victor, who had been made Augustus while still an infant."
'Epitome de Caesaribus'
 
"At length also, new races of tyrants sprang up, in terrific numbers, and the island, still bearing its Roman name, but casting off her institutes and laws, sent forth among the Gauls that bitter scion of her own planting Maximus, with a great number of followers, and the ensigns of royalty, which he bore without decency and without lawful right, but in a tyrannical manner, and amid the disturbances of the seditious soldiery. He, by cunning arts rather than by valour, attaching to his rule, by perjury and false hood, all the neighbouring towns and provinces, against the Roman state, extended one of his wings to Spain, the other to Italy, fixed the seat of his unholy government at Treves, and so furiously pushed his rebellion against his lawful emperors that he drove one of them out of Rome, and caused the other to terminate his holy life. Trusting to these successful attempts, he not long after lost his accursed head before the walls of Aquileia, whereas he had before cut off the crowned heads of almost all the world."
VEGETIUS (fl.c.385-400) in his 'Epitoma Rei Militaris' ('Summary of Military Matters'), wrote:
"Associated with the larger galleys are scouting skiffs, which have around twenty oars on each side, and which the Britons call Picati [tar-daubed]. These are intended to locate and at times intercept the passage of enemy ships and to discover by observation their arrival or plans. However, to prevent these scout vessels being easily visible through the brightness of their appearance, their sails and rigging are dyed sea-green, and even the pitch with which ships are ordinarily daubed is made that colour. The sailors and marines wear sea-green clothing so that as they go about their scouting they may escape detection the more easily not only by night but also by day."
ST.NINIAN is the earliest recorded Christian missionary north of Hadrian's Wall; building the earliest known church in, what is now, Scotland. He is first mentioned by Bede, who said Ninian was:
"... a most reverend bishop and holy man of the British nation, who had been regularly instructed at Rome, in the faith and mysteries of the truth; whose episcopal see, named after St.Martin the bishop, and famous for a stately church (wherein he and many other saints rest in the body), is still in existence among the English nation. The place belongs to the province of the Bernicians, and is generally called the White House, because he there built a church of stone, which was not usual among the Britons."
Ailred (St.Ailred, 1109-67, Abbot of Rievaux), in the preface of his 'Life of St.Ninian', refers to Bede:
"On the trustworthy testimony of this great author, we have been made acquainted with the origin of Saint Ninian ... But that which he briefly, in view of the tenor of his history, seemeth barely to have touched upon, a book of his Life and Miracles, written in a barbarous style, detaileth at greater length. This book, never varying from the foundation of this witness, hath recorded in historical fashion the way whereby he made this commencement, merited such fruit, and attained unto so worthy an end."
Ailred then begins his account of Ninian's life:
"Therefore in the island of Britannia ... did the blessed Ninian spring: in that region, it is supposed, in the western part of the island (where the ocean stretching as an arm, and making as it were on either side two angles, divideth at this day the realms of the Scots and the Angles) ..."
There is a strong mythological element to Ailred's account, and he makes the unlikely claim that Ninian was the son of a king. At any rate, Ninian studied in Rome, and Ailred asserts that:
"The Roman Pontiff, hearing that some in the western parts of Britain had not yet received the faith of our Saviour, and that some had heard the word of the gospel either from heretics or from men ill instructed in the law of God, moved by the Spirit of God, consecrated the said man of God [Ninian] to the episcopate with his own hands, and, after giving him his benediction, sent him forth as an apostle to the people aforesaid."
On his return journey to Britain from Rome, Ninian spent some time with St.Martin de Tours, at Marmoutier Abbey.
"Ninian besought of the saint masons, stating that he proposed to himself that, as in faith, so in the ways of building churches and in constituting ecclesiastical offices, he desired to imitate the holy Roman Church. The most blessed man assented to his wishes; and so, satiated with mutual conversations as with heavenly feasts, after embraces, kisses, and tears shed by both, they parted, holy Martin remaining in his own See, and Ninian hastening forth under the guidance of Christ to the work whereunto the Holy Ghost had called him... he selected for himself a site in the place which is now termed Witerna [meaning 'White House'; modern Whithorn, Galloway], which, situated on the shore of the ocean, and extending far into the sea on the east, west, and south sides, is closed in by the sea itself, while only on the north is a way open to those who would enter. There, therefore, by the command of the man of God, the masons whom he had brought with him built a church, and they say that before that none in Britannia had been constructed of stone. And having first learnt that the most holy Martin, whom he held always in wondrous affection, had passed from earth to heaven, he was careful to dedicate the church itself in his honour."
The probable date of St.Martin's death is 397, which suggests that St.Ninian's, whitewashed, church was finished shortly after that time. When he died (c.432), Ninian was, says Ailred:
"... buried in the Church of Blessed Martin, which he had built from the foundations, and he was placed in a stone sarcophagus near the altar ..."
That, somewhat vitriolic, account of Magnus Maximus' imperial career comes from 'De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae' (Concerning the Ruin and Conquest of Britain), written, in the 540s, by the British monk Gildas (St.Gildas 'The Wise'). Bede called Gildas "their [the Britons] own historian", using him as a source in his own, highly regarded, 'Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum' (Ecclesiastical History of the English People). Gildas himself, however, was not interested in presenting an unbiased account of events:
"Whatever in this my epistle I may write in my humble but well-meaning manner, rather by way of lamentation than for display, let no one suppose that it springs from contempt of others, or that I foolishly esteem myself as better than they; for, alas! the subject of my complaint is the general destruction of every thing that is good, and the general growth of evil throughout the land; but that I would condole with my country in her distress and rejoice to see her revive therefrom: for it is my present purpose to relate the deeds of an indolent and slothful race, rather than the exploits of those who have been valiant in the field."
As Bede recognised, behind the ranting, Gildas does contain factual nuggets. He is sketchy on detail, and chronology is almost absent, however, Gildas is the earliest extant source for events in Britain at the time of, and immediately after, Roman abandonment.
The 'Historia Brittonum' (History of the Britons), although it contains much obviously fabulous material, cannot be completely dismissed. It notes that:
"He [Maximus] withdrew from Britain with all his military force, slew Gratian, the king of the Romans, and obtained the sovereignty of all Europe. Unwilling to send back his warlike companions to their wives, children and possessions in Britain, he conferred upon them numerous districts from the lake on the summit of Mons Jovis, to the city called Cant Guic, and to the western Tumulus, that is, to Cruc Occident. These are the Armoric Britons, and they remain there to the present day..."
It is plausible that this was the beginning of the Brythonic speaking settlement of Brittany. Apparently, in 1983 there were celebrations to mark the 1600th anniversary of the Breton nation. At this point in the history of Britain, the threshold of the so called Dark Ages, fact and legend become almost seamlessly entwined. Magnus Maximus is usually equated with Macsen Wledig (Wledig - the Imperator) of Welsh tradition. He appears in royal genealogies and is featured in 'The Mabinogion'.
"After this, Britain is left deprived of all her soldiery and armed bands, of her cruel governors, and of the flower of her youth, who went with Maximus, but never again returned; and utterly ignorant as she was of the art of war, groaned in amazement for many years under the cruelty of two foreign nations-the Scots from the north-west, and the Picts from the north."
Gildas
"We call these foreign nations, not on account of their being seated out of Britain, but because they were remote from that part of it which was possessed by the Britons; two inlets of the sea lying between them, one of which runs in far and broad into the land of Britain, from the Eastern Ocean, and the other from the Western, though they do not reach so as touch one another. The eastern has in the midst of it the city Giudi [Stirling]. The western has on it, that is, on the right hand thereof, the city Alcluith [Dumbarton], which in their language signifies the Rock Cluith, for it is close by the river of that name."
Bede
"The Britons, impatient at the assaults of the Scots and Picts, their hostilities and dreadful oppressions, send ambassadors to Rome with letters, entreating in piteous terms the assistance of an armed band to protect them, and offering loyal and ready submission to the authority of Rome, if they only would expel their invading foes. A legion is immediately sent, forgetting their past rebellion, and provided sufficiently with arms. When they had crossed over the sea and landed, they came at once to close conflict with their cruel enemies, and slew great numbers of them. All of them were driven beyond the borders, and the humiliated natives rescued from the bloody slavery which awaited them. By the advice of their protectors, they now built a wall ..."
Gildas
The poet Claudian (Claudius Claudianus), referring to the year 398, writes:
"With the Saxons subjugated the sea is now more peaceful, with the Picts broken Britain is secure."
However, Gildas continues:
"The Roman legion had no sooner returned home in joy and triumph, than their former foes, like hungry and ravening wolves, rushing with greedy jaws upon the fold which is left without a shepherd, and wafted both by the strength of oarsmen and the blowing wind, break through the boundaries, and spread slaughter on every side, and like mowers cutting down the ripe corn, they cut up, tread under foot, and overrun the whole country.
And now again they send suppliant ambassadors, with their garments rent and their heads covered with ashes, imploring assistance from the Romans, and like timorous chickens, crowding under the protecting wings of their parents, that their wretched country might not altogether be destroyed, and that the Roman name, which now was but an empty sound to fill the ear, might not become a reproach even to distant nations. Upon this, the Romans, moved with compassion, as far as human nature can be, at the relations of such horrors, send forward, like eagles in their flight, their unexpected bands of cavalry by land and mariners by sea, and planting their terrible swords upon the shoulders of their enemies, they mow them down like leaves which fall at the destined period; and as a mountain-torrent swelled with numerous streams, and bursting its banks with roaring noise, with foaming crest and yeasty wave rising to the stars, by whose eddying currents our eyes are as it were dazzled, does with one of its billows overwhelm every obstacle in its way, so did our illustrious defenders vigorously drive our enemies' band beyond the sea, if any could so escape them; for it was beyond those same seas that they transported, year after year, the plunder which they had gained, no one daring to resist them."
It is thought possible that this latter expedition might be the one mentioned by Claudian in a panegyric, 'On the Consulship of Stilicho', delivered early in 400:
"Next spoke Britannia, dressed in the skin of some Caledonian beast, her cheeks tattooed, her sea-blue mantle sweeping over her footsteps like the surge of Ocean: "I too, when on the point of death at the hands of neighbouring tribes, found in Stilicho protection, when the Scots roused all Ireland and the sea foamed beneath hostile oars. His care ensured I need not fear the missiles of the Scots, nor tremble at the Picts, nor watch on all my shores for Saxons to arrive with every shifting wind.""
'The Romans Leaving Britain'
by Sir John Everett Millais (1829-1896)
"The Romans, therefore, left the country, giving notice that they could no longer be harassed by such labourious expeditions, nor suffer the Roman standards, with so large and brave an army, to be worn out by sea and land by fighting against these unwarlike, plundering vagabonds; but that the islanders, inuring themselves to warlike weapons, and bravely fighting, should valiantly protect their country, their property, wives and children, and, what is dearer than these, their liberty and lives; that they should not suffer their hands to be tied behind their backs by a nation which, unless they were enervated by idleness and sloth, was not more powerful than themselves, but that they should arm those hands with buckler, sword, and spear, ready for the field of battle; and, because they thought this also of advantage to the people they were about to leave, they, with the help of the miserable natives, built a wall different from the former ... They then give energetic counsel to the timorous native, and leave them patterns by which to manufacture arms Moreover, on the south coast where their vessels lay, as there was some apprehension lest the barbarians might land, they erected towers at stated intervals, commanding a prospect of the sea; and then left the island never to return."
Gildas
Since the death of Theodosius, in 395, the Empire had been ruled by Thodosius' two sons: Honorius in the west and Arcadius in the east. The real power, however, lay in the hands of the military commander Stilicho, a Vandal. Claudian, writing in 402, implies that Stilicho removed a legion from Britain to assist in his defence of Italy against the Visigoths.
"There also came the legion set to guard the furthest Britons, the legion that curbs the savage Scot and scans the lifeless patterns tattooed on dying Picts."
At this point, an episode not specifically mentioned by Gildas has to be inserted into his narrative:
 
CONSTANTINE III was proclaimed emperor by the British garrison in 407. He was actually their third choice, the first two proving to be unsuitable:
"... when the consuls were Arcadius for the sixth time and Probus[406], the Vandals had joined forces with the Suebi and the Alans, overrun the trans-Alpine regions and destroyed the peoples. Having wrought much slaughter, they became formidable even to the armies in Britain, which, being afraid they might march against Britain, they drove to the point of choosing tyrants ..."
Zosimus
"... they proclaimed Marcus as tyrant. Afterwards, however, they slew Marcus, and proclaimed Gratian. Within four months subsequently they killed Gratian, and elected Constantine in his place, imagining that, on account of his name, he would be able to reduce the empire firmly under his authority ... Constantine passed over from Britain to Bononia [Boulogne], a maritime city of Gaul; and after inducing all the troops in Gaul and Aquitania to espouse his cause, he reduced to obedience the inhabitants of the regions extending to the mountains which divide Italy from Gaul, and which the Romans have named the Cottian Alps."
'The Ecclesiastical History of Salaminius Hermias Sozomenus'
Stilicho sent a force, commanded by Sarus, against Constantine. Sarus enjoyed initial success, killing both of Constantine's generals:
"Constantine now appointed Ediovinchus, a Frank, and Gerontius, a Briton, as his new generals, men for whose military experience and courage Sarus had respect... Constantine's generals ran out after him [Sarus] with all their might and main, and it was only with great difficulty that he escaped... Constantine was establishing garrisons in the Alpine regions, so that they [the legitimate Roman forces] might not have free access into Gaul. He also was setting safeguards along the Rhine, which had been neglected since the reign of the Emperor Julian... he despatched to Spain the elder of his two sons, Constans, having decked him out in the dress of a Caesar. For he wanted to bring all the Spanish nations under his sway so as both to extend his rule and to wipe out the dynasty of Honorius' kinsmen there. Indeed, he was growing fearful lest these latter might some day collect a force of soldiers there, cross the Pyrenees and attack him while the Emperor Honorius simultaneously might dispatch his armies from Italy, encircle him on all sides, and remove him from his tyranny."
Zosimus
Constans, accompanied by Gerontius, accomplished his mission in Spain, and:
"... returned to his father Constantine, bringing with him Verenianus and Didymus [relations of Honorius]. He had left behind the general Gerontius together with his Gallic soldiers to guard the road between France and Spain ..."
Zosimus
In 409, Constantine sent emissaries to Honorius. Honorius, under severe pressure from the Visigoths, lead by Alaric, was in a weak position (he had also executed Stilicho the previous year), and he seems to have recognised Constantine.
"... a report having been spread that he had conspired against the emperor, and had formed a scheme, in conjunction with those in power, to raise his son to the throne ... Stilicho himself was slain by the soldiers at Ravenna. He had attained almost absolute power; and all men, so to speak, whether Romans or barbarians, were under his control. Thus perished Stilicho, on a suspicion of having conspired against the emperors. Eucherius, his son, was also slain."
'The Ecclesiastical History of Salaminius Hermias Sozomenus'
"... the usurper Constantine sent eunuchs to Honorius begging pardon for deigning to assume the rank of emperor. He alleged that he had not purposely chosen to do so, but that it was a result of the constraints brought to bear on him by the soldiers. Upon hearing this request and seeing that it was not easy for him to contemplate other wars, with Alaric's barbarians not far away and also his kinsmen being held by the usurper, Honorius gave in to the request and sent Constantine the imperial apparel. Honorius' concern for his kinsmen was in fact futile since they had been put to death prior to this embassy."
Zosimus *
Constantine's luck was about to run out:
"Constans was again despatched to Spain by his father and took with him the general Justus. Gerontius became angry at this ..."
Zosimus *
"... Constantine, who still thought that matters would go according to his purpose, caused his son to be proclaimed emperor instead of Caesar, and determined to possess himself of Italy. With this view, he crossed the Cottian Alps ... He was on the point of crossing the Po, when he was compelled to retrace his steps, upon being informed of the death of Alavicus. This Alavicus was the commander of the troops of Honorius, and being suspected of conspiring to place the entire Western government under the domination of Constantine, he was slain when returning from a procession, in which, according to custom, it was his office to march in advance of the emperor. Immediately after this occurrence, the emperor descended from horseback, and publicly returned thanks to God for having delivered him from one who had openly conspired against him. Constantine fled and seized Arles ... On the decline of the power of Constantine, the Vandals, Suebi, and Alans eagerly took the Pyrenees when they heard that it was a prosperous and most abundant region. And since those who had been entrusted by Constans with the guard of the passage had neglected their duty, the invaders passed by into Spain.
Meanwhile Gerontius, from being the most efficient of the generals of Constantine, became his enemy; and believing that Maximus, his intimate friend, was well qualified for the tyranny, he invested him with the imperial robe ..."
'The Ecclesiastical History of Salaminius Hermias Sozomenus'
Constantine's world was collapsing:
"The barbarians above the Rhine, attacking in force, reduced the inhabitants of Britain and some parts of Gaul to such straits that they were obliged to throw off Roman rule, and live their own lives, no longer subject to Roman laws."
Zosimus **
"Britain was devastated by an incursion of the Saxons. The Vandals and Alans wasted parts of Gaul ..."
Anonymous 'Chronicle of 452'
"Accordingly the Britons took up arms and, with no consideration of the danger to themselves, freed their own cities from barbarian threat; likewise all of Armorica and other Gallic provinces followed the Britons' lead: they freed themselves, ejected the Roman magistrates, and set up home rule at their own discretion... the defection of Britain and Gaul occurred during Constantine's tyranny because the barbarians took advantage of his careless government."
Zosimus **
Alaric, in the meantime had installed his own puppet emperor, Attalus, in Rome (Honorius' court was in Ravenna). Alaric set about persuading the reluctant to support Attalus:
"... Alaric attacked all the cities of Aemilia that had refused to accept promptly Attalus' rule. He brought over with no trouble at all every one of them except Bononia [Bologna], which he besieged for several days but could not capture as it held firm. He then proceeded to the Ligurians and compelled them to recognise Attalus as Emperor. Honorius, however, wrote letters to the cities of Britain, urging them to fend for themselves."
Zosimus **
These letters are often seen as marking the Empire's abandonment of Britain.
Within a year of his elevation to the purple, Attalus was removed from office by Alaric. Shortly after, Alaric, famously, sacked Rome - entering the city on 24th August 410. Meanwhile, in Gaul, according to Salaminius Hermias Sozomenus:
"As soon as Constantine heard of the usurpation of Maximus, he sent one of his generals, named Ediovinchus, beyond the Rhine, to levy an army of Franks and Alamanni; and he sent his son Constans to guard Vienne and the neighbouring towns."
Gerontius marched against Constantine:
"... and took care to put Constans, the son of Constantine, to death at Vienne... Gerontius then advanced upon Arles and laid siege to it ..."
By now, however, Alaric had died, and, in 411, Honorius was able to despatch an army, under the command of one Constantius, against Constantine.
"... when the army of Honorius had come to hand against the tyrant ... Gerontius retreated precipitately with a few soldiers; for the greater number of his troops deserted to the army of Constantius. The Spanish soldiery conceived an utter contempt for Gerontius, on account of his retreat, and took counsel how to slay him. They, gathered in close ranks and attacked his house at night; but he, with one Alanus, his friend, and a few servants, ascended to the top of the house, and did such execution with their arrows that no less than three hundred of the soldiers fell. When the stock of arrows was exhausted, the servants made their escape by letting themselves down secretly from the building; and Gerontius, although he might have been saved in a similar fashion, did not choose to do so, because he was restrained by his affection for Nonnichia, his wife. At daybreak of the next day, the soldiers cast fire into the house; when he saw that there was no hope of safety left, he cut off the head of his companion, Alanus, in compliance with his wish. After this, his own wife was lamenting, and with tears was pressing herself with the sword, pleading to die by the hand of her husband before she should be subjected to others, and was supplicating for this last gift from him. And this woman by her courage showed herself worthy of her religion, for she was a Christian, and she died thus mercifully; she handed down to time a record of herself, too strong for oblivion. Gerontius then struck himself thrice with his sword; but perceiving that he had not received a mortal wound, he drew forth his poniard, which he wore at his side, and plunged it into his heart."
Whilst Constantius was besieging Constantine in Arles, Ediovinchus arrived with reinforcements, but they were ambushed. Ediovinchus was murdered by the acquaintance on whose property he sought refuge:
"When Constantine heard of the death of Ediovinchus he cast aside his purple robe and imperial ornaments, and repaired to the church, where he caused himself to be ordained as presbyter. Those within the walls, having first received oaths, opened the gates, and their lives were spared. From that period the whole province returned to its allegiance to Honorius, and has since been obedient to the rulers of his appointment. Constantine, with his son Julian, was sent into Italy, but he was waylaid and killed... Not long afterwards ... Maximus ... and many others who had conspired against Honorius, were unexpectedly slain... After Constantius, who was a brave and able general, had destroyed the tyrant Constantine, the emperor rewarded him by giving him his sister in marriage; he also bestowed upon him the ermine and purple, and admitted him to a share in the government."
The last word goes to Procopius of Caesarea, from his 'History of the Wars' (written c.550):
"... Constantine, defeated in battle, died with his sons. However, the Romans never succeeded in recovering Britannia, but it remained from that time on under tyrants."
 
Gildas continues:
"No sooner were they [the Romans] gone, than the Picts and Scots, like worms which in the heat of mid-day come forth from their holes, hastily land again from their canoes, in which they had been carried beyond the tithicam vallem, differing one from another in manners, but inspired with the same avidity for blood, and all more eager to shroud their villainous faces in bushy hair than to cover with decent clothing those parts of their body which required it. Moreover, having heard of the departure of our friends, and their resolution never to return, they seized with greater boldness than before on all the country towards the extreme north as far as the wall. To oppose them there was placed on the heights a garrison equally slow to fight and ill adapted to run away, a useless and panic-struck company, who clambered away days and nights on their unprofitable watch. Meanwhile the hooked weapons of their enemies were not idle, and our wretched countrymen were dragged from the wall and dashed against the ground. Such premature death, however, painful as it was, saved them from seeing the miserable sufferings of their brothers and children. But why should I say more? they left their cities, abandoned the protection of the wall and dispersed themselves in flight more desperately than before. The enemy, on the other hand, pursued them with more unrelenting cruelty than before, and butchered our countrymen like sheep, so that their habitations were like those of savage beasts; for they turned their arms upon each other, and for the sake of a little sustenance, imbrued their hands in the blood of their fellow countrymen. Thus foreign calamities were augmented by domestic feuds; so that the whole country was entirely destitute of provisions, save such as could be procured in the chase."
POSTSCRIPT
Recent research may indicate that Roman influence had long been in decline before Britain was finally abandoned. Writing in 'British Archaeology' (Issue 55, October 2000), Neil Faulkner claims that:
"... it now seems that Roman culture was disintegrating in Britain from the early 200s and had almost completely gone by the end of the 4th century.
This gradual but inexorable collapse affected towns, villas and villages. Nothing was exempt. The imperial project, the bringing of civilised life to barbarian lands, started with enthusiasm but ended - and ended early - amid piles of refuse and squalor, with abandoned farms and villages, country houses turned into barns and workshops, and towns heavily fortified by an embattled class of state officials desperate to cling on to power."
Analysis of data from many urban sites across England was undertaken:
"... ranging from Wroxeter to Canterbury and from Exeter to Lincoln. A clear pattern emerged. Most civic buildings were erected in about AD75-150, most private town-houses in about AD150-225, and urban occupation (measured by rooms in use) reached peak levels in the early 3rd century.
Civic construction work then collapsed as resources were diverted into building town walls in the mid to late 3rd century. There was a partial recovery in the early 4th - the so-called 'Constantian renaissance' - but it was a temporary blip, and, from around AD325, Romano-British towns faced terminal decline. Few new buildings were erected, many old ones were abandoned, and by about AD400 there was little left in most places but a wasteland of ruins and rubbish...
What the archaeology as a whole shows is near-total collapse of the Roman settlement pattern - not just the disappearance of towns, but of villas too, and indeed many native villages and farmsteads.
Two further recent surveys add weight to this view - one by Jack Newman of 78 villas randomly selected from published reports, another by Katie Meheux from the Institute of Archaeology (UCL) of 162 possible villa sites in the Severn Valley/Welsh Marches region...
One favoured explanation for urban decline is that the Romano-British gentry 'retreated to the countryside' to escape the burdens of public service in towns, and there, from the late 3rd century onwards, invested heavily in the embellishment of their country seats...
In fact, the boom in the villa economy seems to have ended early in that century. Newman's survey showed that between AD300 (the peak) and AD350 the amount of new building-work undertaken on villas fell by almost two thirds. Both his survey and that of Meheux revealed that a majority of villas had been abandoned by about AD375 and virtually all by about AD400.
The odd exception - like Whitley Grange in Shropshire - cannot alter the general picture. Much more typical were sites like Gorhambury in Hertfordshire, where the grand house was a ruin and had been incorporated into the farmyard by the mid-4th century, and Thurnham in Kent, where one of the central rooms was being used as an iron smithy at an even earlier date.
Native villages and farmsteads fared somewhat better, but many were still deserted or contracted sharply in the 4th century. Katie Meheux surveyed 317 native rural sites in the Severn Valley/Welsh Marches region and discovered a fall of 27 per cent in the number occupied between AD100-150 and AD350-400. My own more modest survey of 177 rural sites excavated in 1969-96 (as listed in the Roman archaeology journal Britannia) showed a fall of 35 per cent for the same period."
Also in 'British Archaeology' (Issue 20, December 1996), Dr Michael Jones states:
"Without doubt, the fate of Roman Britain was tied to events and processes elsewhere in the Roman Empire. However, concentration on archaeological evidence, the economy, and the wider imperial context does not explain satisfactorily why the ending of Roman rule and culture in Britain was so early, so rapid, so complete - and so unlike the experience of the rest of the western empire. Careful attention must also be paid to distinctively Romano-British factors. Archaeological evidence alone can never answer a number of vital questions - the attitudes of the Britons toward Roman rule, for example."
Dr Jones suggests that the Britons had not been as fully assimilated into the Roman Empire as is usually thought:
"Successful Romanisation would have created an identification with Rome, so that British provincials did not think consciously of 'we' and 'you'. Romanisation is often thought to have spread in a lower key beyond the élite into the lower classes. However, a more novel reading of the Late Roman and early medieval literary evidence suggests that Romanisation in Britain had in fact failed in several vital respects.
Although the Romans are generally thought to have been largely free of regional and ethnic prejudice, a distinctly and consistently hostile attitude toward the Britons is detectable in Late Roman literature... Britain was regarded as a spawning ground for usurpers... In a crucial passage written at the beginning of the 6th century, the historian Zosimus described the final revolt and recorded that the Britons had thrown off Roman rule, expelled their Roman governors, and set up their own administration. Thereafter, the Britons lived independently 'without submission to Roman laws'. Zosimus is not the most reliable of Roman historians, and the implications of his account are much debated. In an important sense, however, Roman Britain ended when the Britons no longer regarded themselves as Romans. According to Zosimus, this had happened by the close of the first decade of the 5th century."
 
In the interests of clarity, the spelling of names has been made consistent within this page.
Translations:
'Historia Brittonum' by J.A. Giles
Gildas 'De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae'
Procopius, 'History of the Wars' by H.B. Dewing
'Epitome de Caesaribus' by Thomas M. Banchich
Sulpitius Severus 'Life of St.Martin' by Alexander Roberts
Vegetius 'Epitoma Rei Militaris' and Claudian by S. Ireland
Bede 'Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum' probably by L.C. Jane
Zosimus 'Historia Nova' by James J. Buchanan and Harold T. Davis, except * by S. Ireland, and ** a composite translation.