No Worse Deed Than This

The 'Anglo-Saxon Chronicle' entry, in Manuscripts A, B and C, for 975, begins:

Here ended his earthly dreams
Edgar, of Angles king; chose him other light,
serene and lovely, spurning this frail abode,
a life that mortals here call lean he quitted with disdain.
July the month, by all agreed in this our land,
whoever were in chronic lore correctly taught;
the day the eighth, when Edgar young,
rewarder of heroes, his life - his throne - resigned.
Edward his son, unwaxen child, of earls the prince,
succeeded then to England's throne.

It seems that Edgar's personal magnetism had been the only force maintaining unity amongst the English nobility:

"At his death the whole kingdom sustained a shock, and after the glad time of peace, which existed all his life, troubles began to come in on every side. For, dazzled by numerous presents, Alfere [Ælfhere], chief of the Mercians, and very many nobles of the kingdom, expelled the abbots and monks from the monasteries in which the pacific king Edgar had placed them, and introduced clerks and their wives. But this piece of madness was opposed by some conscientious men, to wit, Athelwin [Æthelwine], ealdorman of the East Angles, a friend of God, and his brother Alfwold [Ælfwold], and the pious ealdorman [of Essex], Brihtnoth [Byrhtnoth]; who meeting together, declared that they could not permit the monks, who were the depositaries of all the religion of the kingdom, to be expelled therefrom. They then assembled a great army, and bravely defended the monasteries of the East Angles....
Edgar was thirty-two years old when he died. He was survived by two young sons. The eldest (about thirteen) was Edward, whose mother was Edgar's first wife, Æthelflæd. The youngest (about seven) was Æthelred, whose mother was Edgar's widow, Ælfthryth.
.... In the meantime the nobles of the kingdom were very much at variance in the matter of electing a king: for some chose the king's son Eadward [Edward], and some chose his brother Aethelred. On this account the archbishops Dunstan [of Canterbury] and Oswald [of York], with a great number of bishops, abbots, and ealdormen, met in a body, and chose Eadward; according as his father had desired; and after his election crowned and anointed him king."
"... Edward, Edgar's son, succeeded to the kingdom; and then soon, in the same year, during harvest, appeared "cometa" the star; and then came in the following year a very great famine, and very manifold commotions among the English people... And at that time, also, was Oslac the great earl banished from England."
'Anglo-Saxon Chronicle', Manuscripts D and E
Manuscripts D and E, of the 'Anglo-Saxon Chronicle', record a freak accident (dated to 978, though probably applying to 977): "This year all the oldest counsellors of England fell at Calne [Wiltshire] from an upper floor; but the holy Archbishop Dunstan stood alone upon a beam. Some were dreadfully bruised: and some did not escape with life."  The meeting at Calne was, apparently, one of a number of synods held to address the grievances of the secular canons (clerks), who had been enthusiastically expelled during the monastic reforms of Edgar's reign.

In 978 Edward was murdered. Manuscripts D and E of the 'Anglo-Saxon Chronicle' report:

"This year was King Edward slain, at eventide, at Corfe-gate, on the fifteenth day before the calends of April [18th March]. And he was buried at Wareham without any royal honour."

The 'Chronicle' apportions no blame for Edward's killing. The earliest account of the murder appears in the 'Vita Sancti Oswaldi' (Life of St.Oswald), written c.1000, and usually attributed to Byrhtferth of Ramsey. Edward is said to have been visiting his brother, Æthelred, and stepmother, Ælfthryth. A group of Æthelred's men met Edward, and, before he could dismount, stabbed him. There are no indications that anyone other than Æthelred's retainers were involved in the murder. In a sermon of 1014, Archbishop Wulfstan of York refers to the murder, but avoids naming those responsible:

"They plotted against Edward and then killed and afterwards burnt him."

Before the end of the 11th century, however, it was commonly alleged that Ælfthryth had plotted the killing.

Adam of Bremen (d.c.1081), in a scholium, states that Edward ("a very holy man") was murdered by his stepmother, so that she could secure the throne for her own son. Christine E. Fell, in 'Edward, King and Martyr', suggests that Osbern of Canterbury, in a 'Life' of St.Dunstan (written c.1090), seems to remark that Edward was "killed by his stepmother's crime" in such a casual manner that he was "mentioning a well-known fact, nothing new or disputable."
William of Malmesbury writing c.1125: "... king Edward conducted himself with becoming affection to his infant brother and his stepmother; retained only the name of king, and gave them the power; followed the footsteps of his father's piety, and gave both his attention and his heart to good counsel. The woman, however, with a stepmother's hatred, began to meditate a subtle stratagem, in order that not even the title of king might be wanting to her child, and to lay a treacherous snare for her son-in-law, which she accomplished in the following manner. He was returning home, tired with the chase, and gasping with thirst from the exercise, while his companions were following the dogs in different directions as it happened, when hearing that they dwelt in a neighbouring mansion, the youth proceeded thither at full speed, unattended and unsuspecting, as he judged of others by his own feelings. On his arrival, alluring him to her with female blandishment, she made him fix his attention upon herself, and after saluting him, while he was eagerly drinking from the cup which had been presented, the dagger of an attendant pierced him through. Dreadfully wounded, with all his remaining strength he spurred his horse in order to join his companions; when one foot slipping, he was dragged by the other through the winding paths, while the streaming blood gave evidence of his death to his followers. Moreover, they then commanded him to be ingloriously interred at Wareham, grudging him even holy ground when dead, as they had envied him his royal dignity while living. They now publicly manifested their extreme joy, as if they had buried his memory with his body; but God's all-seeing eye was there, who ennobled the innocent victim by the glory of miracles; so much is human outweighed by heavenly judgement, for lights were there shown from above."
William of Malmesbury appears to have derived his story from the 'Passio et Miracula Sancti Eadwardi Regis et Martyris'. Assuming the author of the 'Passio' is being truthful when he tells of miracles which occurred during the lifetime of his informants, Christine E. Fell ('Edward, King and Martyr') reasons: "... he must have been writing in the last quarter of the eleventh century or the first few years of the twelfth." (no extant version is earlier than the 12th century). Although she admits there is "no very positive evidence for attributing the Passio to any known hagiographer", Professor Fell tends towards the idea that it was the work of Goscelin - in which case: "... it seems probable that it was written during the same decade as the rest of his work on the saints of the Midlands and Western England, i.e. 1070-1080 ..."
In February 979, Edward's body was discovered. It was taken, first, to the church at Wareham (on 13th February), and then translated ("with great honour"), by Ealdorman Ælfhere of Mercia, to Shaftesbury Abbey (on 18th February). Despite Wulfstan's statement that it had been burned, the 'Vita Sancti Oswaldi' remarks on the body's uncorrupted nature - a common manifestation of saintliness. In a charter of 1001 (S 899), in which Æthelred granted Bradford on Avon to the nuns of Shaftesbury (to be used as a refuge from Viking raids), he says he makes the gift "to Christ and to his Saint, namely my brother Edward, whom the Lord himself deigns to exult in our days by many signs of virtue, after his blood was shed".  In the same year, on 20th June, Edward's relics were enshrined within Shaftesbury Abbey. Professor Fell writes: "It seems likely that the 1001 ceremony and charter were the result of popular pro-Edward feeling or episcopal pressure as soon as Ælfthryth's power was removed." (Ælfthryth died after 998 and before 1002).
Professor Fell suggests that a 'Life' of Edward, "from accession to final resting place", was composed, at Shaftesbury, shortly after 1001. She argues that this 'Life' was used as a source for the 'Passio'.  Professor Fell maintains that: "The author of the Passio first or second redaction, may be an unreliable historian, adding little to our knowledge of actual events, but the Passio is a primary source, and it is on the Passio that the Edward cult is based, and from the Passio that almost all writing on Edward derives."  Although clearly derived from the 'Passio' story, a note by Henry of Huntingdon (probably writing between 1125 and 1130) presents it in a somewhat garbled form: "It is reported that his stepmother, that is the mother of King Ethelred [Æthelred], stabbed him with a dagger while she was in the act of offering him a cup to drink."  Walter Map (late-12th century) distorts the story even more, claiming that Ælfthryth "first gave him poison, and, when this failed of its effect, had him slain at Shaftesbury by the soldiers of his company".  Two lengthier variations on the 'Passio' theme, each presenting a unique twist to the tale, are told in the chronicle attributed to John of Wallingford (compiled around the second quarter of the 13th century) and by Geffrei Gaimar (about 1140). John of Wallingford says that Edward was stabbed by his step-mother, who then "wrapped it [Edward's body], it is said, in lead, and for a long time hid it in the river Stour".  In Gaimar's variant, Edward "had a dwarf, Wolstanet, who knew how to dance and bound, how to leap and tumble, and play several other games". On the fateful day, Edward commands Wolstanet to perform. The dwarf refuses and rides off "to the house of Elstruet [Ælfthryth]". Edward follows and the scene in which he is stabbed (by "some one, I know not who") ensues.
A 1008 law-code of Æthelred states: "the councillors have determined that St.Edward's Day shall be celebrated throughout England on the 18th of March".

Florence of Worcester's entry for 978 asserts that Edward was:

"... wickedly slain at Corvesgeate, by his own servants, acting under the commands of his step-mother, queen Alftryth [Ælfthryth], and was buried at Wareham, without any royal pomp."

'Anglo-Saxon Chronicle' (Manuscripts D and E):

"No worse deed than this was ever done by the English nation since they first sought the land of Britain. Men murdered him but God has magnified him. He was in life an earthly king - he is now after death a heavenly saint. Him would not his earthly relatives avenge - but his heavenly father has avenged him amply. The earthly homicides would wipe out his memory from the earth - but the avenger above has spread his memory abroad in heaven and in earth. Those, Who would not before bow to his living body, now bow on their knees to His dead bones. Now we may conclude, that the wisdom of men, and their meditations, and their counsels, are as nought against the appointment of God."

Florence of Worcester's 978 entry continues:

"His brother, Aethelred, the noble etheling, of fascinating manners, handsome countenance, and graceful appearance ....
In contrast to Edward, who, from the impression given by the 'Vita Sancti Oswaldi', was a stern, rather tyrannical, character.
.... was, after Easter, in the sixth indiction, to wit, on Sunday, the 18th of the kalends of May [14th April], crowned king at Kingston, by the holy archbishops Dunstan and Oswald, and ten bishops."

Actually, Florence is quite probably wrong here. Manuscript C of the 'Chronicle' follows its announcement of Edward's "martyrdom" with the comment:

"... and Æthelred ætheling, his brother, succeeded to the kingdom; and he was in the same year consecrated king."

However, Manuscript C's next annal, i.e. for 979 begins:

"In this year was Æthelred consecrated king, on the Sunday fortnight after Easter, at Kingston. And there were at his consecration two archbishops, and ten diocesan bishops."

It is thought that the annal for 978 jumps the gun, and that, although Æthelred succeeded in 978, he was not consecrated until 979.

Simon Keynes, in 'The Diplomas of Æthelred 'the Unready' 978-1016', writes: "The annal for 978 in MS 'C' implies that Æthelred was crowned in the same year as Edward was murdered, contradicting the annal for 979; annals from different sources may have been conflated, and the author of the 978 entry may simply have believed that Æthelred's coronation was a natural corollary of his accession."

Indeed, a charter (S 835) of 979 claims to be the first of Æthelred's reign. It seems, therefore, that Æthelred was really consecrated on 4th May 979.

Simon Keynes ('The Diplomas of Æthelred 'the Unready' 978-1016'): "The very fact that Æthelred's coronation was delayed for over a year after his succession may reflect the general confusion and dismay occasioned by the crime, for had it been planned at a high level, in order that Æthelred should become king, one might expect a hasty coronation to seal the matter."  Professor Keynes raises the possibility that it was the discovery of Edward's body, and its burial ("with great honour") at Shaftesbury, in February 979: "... that finally settled the matter and set in motion the train of events that led to Æthelred's coronation ... on 4 May following."  Sir Frank Stenton ('Anglo-Saxon England'): There is nothing to support the allegation ... that Queen Ælfthryth had plotted her stepson's death."
Translations:
'Sermon of the Wolf to the English' by Michael Swanton
'Anglo-Saxon Chronicle' by Rev. James Ingram/Dr. J.A. Giles
Henry of Huntingdon 'Historia Anglorum' by Thomas Forester
'The Chronicles of John Wallingford' by Rev. Joseph Stevenson
Geffrei Gaimar 'L'Estoire des Engleis' by Rev. Joseph Stevenson
Walter Map 'De Nugis Curialium' by Frederick Tupper Ph.D and Marbury Bladen Ogle Ph.D
William of Malmesbury 'Gesta Regum Anglorum' by Rev. J. Sharpe, revised by Rev. J. Stevenson
Florence of Worcester 'Chronicon ex Chronicis' edited and in part translated by Joseph Stevenson
Postscript
Shaftesbury Abbey became a victim of Henry VIII's dissolution of the monasteries, in 1539, but St.Edward's remains were said to have been hidden before Henry's agents arrived. In 1931, a casket, containing bones, was unearthed on the site of the Abbey Church. The bones were examined by a surgeon, who found that they were of a youth, and exhibited damage consistent with the manner in which Edward is purported to have died. John Wilson-Claridge, who excavated the bones (and whose family then owned the site), spent many years trying to find them a suitable home. He was insistent that the bones should be recognised as the relics of a saint, and that a shrine should be established for them. The Russian Orthodox Church in Exile accepted the conditions, and, in September 1984, the bones were enshrined in a former Anglican chapel at Brookwood cemetery, Woking, Surrey. A small monastic community, the Saint Edward Brotherhood, is based at Brookwood.
Valid CSS! Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict